Show #442 Part 1 – Jim DiEugenio, John McAdams

  • Opening statements: First John, then Jim
  • The opening statements present the credibility of evidence as seen by both opponents
  • The points made will be too numerous to list. Please listen to the audio for your best coverage
  • Q: Why should anyone believe the ‘Single Bullet Theory?’
    • A: John – The abrasion collar, no bullet on the x-rays, placement of Connally and Kennedy in the vehicle
    • A: Jim – Direction of the abrasion collar, a .765 bullet found in Dealy Plaza, the location of the back wound, the angle of the wounds through Kennedy and Connally
    • Counterpoint: John – Why the exit was smaller than the entrance wound? Location of the back wound relative to the throat wound
    • Counterpoint: Jim – Malcom Perry’s evidence; the weapons used will never be known
  • Q: Whose portrait of Oswald is correct the Commission’s or Jim Garrison’s?
    • A: Jim – Oswald’s relationship with Ferrie; the Mexican embassy visit; Oswald info at CI/SIG; Oswald’s right-wing ties in Dallas
    • A: John – Evidence that Oswald’s defection is nothing but genuine; Oswald didn’t really know any U-2 secrets; the White Russians took pity on Marina Oswald; the leftist opinions of Oswald in New Orleans
    • Counterpoint: Jim – When Oswald met Ferrie; John Newman paraphrase brought in as evidence; George DeMohrenschildt
    • Counterpoint: John – Countering Jim’s DeMohrenschildt evidence; Oswald only a radar operator, he knew nothing; Oswald just a mixed-up kid
  • Q: Did Oswald go to Mexico City, and if so what did he do there?
    • A: John – Marina said he did as a way to get to Cuba; Oswald had a romantic (idealogical) attachment to Castro; pictures of Oswald in Mexico City and letters; phone numbers of an embassy staffer in Oswald’s book
    • A: Jim – The baggage list doesn’t match the evidence; Oswald’s name spelled wrong;n o pictures of Oswald going or coming out of the embassy; the description didn’t match Oswald
    • Counterpoint: John – Oswald’s sightings were real
    • Counterpoint: Jim – Anne Goodpasture knew who the man purported to be Oswald in the photos was
  • Q: Are you satisfied with the official autopsy?
    • A: Jim: Which of the 3 autopsies?, Descriptions of all 3
    • A: John – The autopsy was rushed by request of the family; why the autopsy was moved
    • Counterpoint: Jim – Mis-orientation of the autopsy photo; Michael Baden proven dishonest
    • Counterpoint: John – The conclusions reached were the same from all panels
  • Q: Do you believe the official x rays and photos are real?
    • A: John – The many ways the x-rays were compared and identified to be JFK
    • A: Jim – To blame this on Hume’s memory lapse is ludicrous; the sinus prints are a red herring
    • Counterpoint: John – Blacked out x-ray not accurate; the set of pictures make sense only as a whole
    • Counterpoint: Jim – The pictures are poorly catalogued, they probably wouldn’t make the evidence list

Black Op Radio
Check out Black Op Radio


About anomaly

ANOMALY is an admin user for the Anomaly Media Network of SMiles Lewis. His lifelong interest in all things anomalous led to his creation (and occasional curation) of the network of websites that includes... / / @ Anomaly / / AnomalyMedia.Biz @ @ Austin-UFOn / AusTex Metro UFO Network @ ELFIS.netForteans @ MemeJack @ / @ @ TexWine @ @ / @
This entry was posted in BlackOp Radio, Conspiracy, ParaPolitics, Podcasts. Bookmark the permalink.